ArticleBMJ public health2024
What factors are associated with children being taken into care by the state after initial contact with services? A survival analysis of Children's Social Care data in Liverpool.
Article in BMJ public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preventing children's care entry: an umbrella review of the risks, protective factors, and interventions.Children and youth services review · 2026Article
- Contact with child protection services during pregnancy: a cross-sectional study using the eLIXIR Born in South London, UK maternity-child data linkage.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Increasing numbers of children in the UK are being taken into care, with adverse consequences for children and unsustainable costs for local government. It is crucial that local authorities better understand which children are most at risk to target preventative interventions. Objectives: To identify predictors of children becoming 'looked after' (taken into care by the state) among children known to a local authority. Methods: Secondary analysis of routinely collected Children's Social Care data including all children who first became known to social care in Liverpool between April 2019 and March 2022, (excluding unaccompanied asylum seeker children). Outcome was time (in months) between first contact with social care and either becoming looked after or reaching the censoring date (March 2022). Survival analysis was undertaken using a discrete time hazard model. Results: 5808 children under 19 became known to Children's Social Care during the study, 377 of whom subsequently became looked after. Black and Asian children were more likely to become looked after, as were those known to social care services pre-birth or in the first year. Key risk factors that increased hazard of becoming looked after were neglect, sexual abuse, emotional abuse, drug and/or alcohol use in the household or the child and mental ill health in the household. Children who had a Child in Need intervention were less likely to become looked after. Children who had a Child Protection Plan were more likely to become looked after. Conclusion: In our study of routinely collected Children's Social Care data, we have identified the key factors that increased the hazard of a child becoming looked after. These findings highlight potential areas for service change and can be used to inform risk prediction and preventative action, however, the local context may influence the generalisability of our findings to other settings. .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.