ArticleBMJ public health2024
'The National Health Insurance scheme would be good and beneficial but I don't trust the system …': a cross-sectional mixed-methods study assessing the awareness and perceptions towards Uganda's proposed National Health Insurance scheme among informal sector workers in Iganga and Mayuge districts, Uganda.
Article in BMJ public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Most low-income countries have prioritised implementing national health insurance schemes (NHIs) as a solution to reducing the high out-of-pocket expenditures on health and enhancing access to healthcare, especially among informal sector workers. However, their perceptions remain unexplored in Uganda. This study aimed to assess the awareness and perceptions of the informal sector workers towards the proposed NHIs in Iganga and Mayuge districts, Uganda. Methodology: A cross-sectional mixed-methods study was conducted in the Iganga and Mayuge districts of eastern Uganda between April and May 2019. Informal sector workers were randomly selected to participate in the study. Six key informant interviews with health workers and seven focus group discussions with informal sector workers were also conducted. Quantitative data was analysed using STATA V.14. Qualitative data was analysed using a thematic analysis approach. Results: A total of 853 respondents participated in the survey: 327/853 (38.3%) were peasant farmers, 248/853 (29.1%) were fishermen, 146/853 (17.1%) were business people and 132/853 (15.5%) were commercial cyclists. Very few, 14/853 (1.6%), were considered knowledgeable about health insurance. The majority 743/853 (87.1%) of the respondents believed that the proposed scheme was beneficial, with a few reservations about lack of trust. Qualitatively, most participants had never heard about health insurance. Most community and health workers welcomed the idea of introducing NHIs in Uganda, although many indicated their lack of trust in the system to deliver a beneficial scheme. Conclusion: There was a high level of support for the proposed National Health Insurance scheme since many believed it would be beneficial. However, there was low awareness and a lack of trust in the system to successfully implement a beneficial scheme due to corruption. There is a need for intensive sensitisation campaigns to raise awareness and boost confidence and trust.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.