ArticleCureus2025
Virtual Reality 360-Degree Films for Objective Structured Clinical Examination Preparation: A Descriptive Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quick response-code linked video-based objective structured practical examination: Bridging gaps in pharmacology education.Indian journal of pharmacology · 2026Article
- From Conventional OSCE to Virtual Reality-Enhanced OSCE: A Narrative Review of Promise and Pitfalls in Medical Education.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Review
- Seeing Is Believing: Real-Life 360-Degree Virtual Reality as a Catalyst for Neurosurgical Interest.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) are a crucial part of medical school assessments, evaluating core clinical skills such as history-taking and communication. As medical school cohorts grow, delivering these resource-intensive examinations becomes increasingly challenging for educators. Students are known to have anxiety when facing OSCEs. This can be lessened with increased bedside teaching and clinical practice opportunities, which can be limited for students in the pre-clinical phase of medical school. Technology-enhanced learning (TEL), including affordable 360-degree video simulations, offers a viable alternative to face-to-face training. This study aims to demonstrate the non-inferiority of 360-degree resources compared to traditional teaching for OSCE preparation, providing an effective independent study tool. Methods Pre-clinical medical students were recruited (n=16) and randomly assigned to the virtual reality (VR) or control group. The virtual reality group utilised 360-degree videos. The control group received a traditional PowerPoint for OSCE preparation. Pre- and post-intervention questionnaires measuring self-perceived confidence and anxiety were completed by both groups. Students in the virtual reality group participated in focus groups to share their experiences. Results There was a statistically significant increase in confidence for OSCEs in both groups (n=12), demonstrating the non-inferiority of the virtual reality resource. The virtual reality group showed a significant increase in self-reported confidence (p=0.0117), and although their anxiety decreased, this was not statistically significant (p=0.1019). Thematic analysis highlighted the benefit of video in reducing anxiety and creating an immersive learning environment. Conclusion VR resources such as 360-degree videos show promise as a tool to prepare pre-clinical medical students for OSCEs, improving confidence and preparedness whilst reducing anxiety. The resource is especially promising in improving the diversity of patient cases. Whilst there is room for improvement in optimising the VR experience and expanding access, the findings support the inclusion of immersive technologies in medical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.