ArticleCureus2025
Massive Bilateral Pulmonary Embolism in a Healthy 37-Year-Old Male: A Case of Atypical Presentation.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a potentially fatal condition caused by the obstruction of pulmonary arteries by a blood clot, commonly originating from deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Although traditional risk factors include recent surgery, immobility, cancer, or thrombophilia, PE can also occur in patients without these predisposing factors, presenting significant diagnostic challenges. In this case report, we present a 37-year-old Pakistani male with no significant medical history who suffered a massive PE. The patient experienced an initial collapse at home and a second collapse en route to the hospital, necessitating cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Despite the absence of conventional risk factors, emergent diagnosis and prompt treatment, including thrombolysis and anticoagulation, led to a positive outcome. This case underscores the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion for PE, even in atypical presentations. It emphasizes the need for clinicians to include PE in the differential diagnosis for sudden collapse, ensuring timely intervention and improved survival rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.