ArticlePrecision chemistry2025
A Practical Approach to Quantitatively Assessing Equilibrium-Constant Accuracy from a Single Binding Isotherm.
Article in Precision chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protocol for detecting in vitro riboswitch conformational switching using a fluorescence anisotropy single-stranded RNA-targeting approach.STAR protocols · 2026Article
- Natural pigments from the endophyte Aspergillus westerdijkiae and evaluation of their bioactivities.Microbial cell factories · 2025Article
- Introducing Quantitative Assessment of Michaelis Constant (KChembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2025Article
- A Browser-Based Tool for Assessing Accuracy of Isothermal Titration Calorimetry-Derived Parameters: KChembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2025Article
- Rapid method for evaluation of CK2 enzymatic activity and CK2α/CK2β-interaction inBiological chemistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Equilibrium constants are essential for understanding and predicting the behavior of chemical systems across various scientific disciplines. Traditionally, these constants are computed via nonlinear regression of reaction isotherms, which show the dependence of the unreacted fraction of one reactant on the total concentration of another reactant. However, while these equilibrium constants can be precise (with small random errors), they may also be grossly inaccurate (with large systematic errors), leading to potential misinterpretations. Although some statistical methods exist for assessing the accuracy of nonlinear regression, their limited practicality for molecular scientists has resulted in their neglect by this research community. The objective of this work is to develop a practical method for quantitatively assessing the accuracy of equilibrium constants that could be easily understood and immediately adopted by researchers routinely determining these constants. Our approach integrates error-propagation and regression-stability analyses to establish the accuracy confidence interval (ACI)-a range within which the true value of the computed parameter lies with a defined probability. In a proof-of-principle study, we applied this approach to develop a workflow for determining the ACI of the equilibrium dissociation constant (
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.