ReviewClinical & translational immunology2025
Organ-on-chip for advancing CAR therapy.
Review in Clinical & translational immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determinants of Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T Cell Success: In Vitro and In Vivo Preclinical Assessment.Cancers · 2026Review
- Recent Advances in Microfluidic Chip Technology for Laboratory Medicine: Innovations and Artificial Intelligence Integration.Biosensors · 2026Review
- 3DACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2026Review
- Plying potency assays for immunotherapy of solid tumors.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- The Potential Use of Digital Twin Technology for Advancing CAR-T Cell Therapy.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite great strides of progress, at least 60% of the responding patients relapse to CAR therapy across the blood malignancies. Off-tumor toxicity apart from functional deficits, cytopenia and infection are the major unfavourable effect of CAR therapy. Models, which faithfully recapitulate the physiology and complexities of immunocompetent tumor microenvironment (TME), paused challenges in capturing potential off-tumor effects of CAR therapy. Importantly, a landmark change in the legislation allows US Food and Drug Administration and New Drugs and Clinical Trial Rules in India encourages researchers to replace animal testing with cell culture approaches relevant to human system. Organ-on-chip (OOC) based on microfluidics technology can potentially emulate multiple biochemical and biophysical intricacies of blood and lymph flow at microscale. Nonetheless, how the evolving microfluidics technology can be enabling to real-time testing of cell and gene is yet to be realised.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.