Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40018364›Full record

ArticleInternational ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. Annual International ACMSIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval2024

PromptLink: Leveraging Large Language Models for Cross-Source Biomedical Concept Linking.

Yuzhang Xie, Jiaying Lu, Joyce Ho, Fadi Nahab, Xiao Hu, Carl Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. Annual International ACMSIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Enhanced Atrial Fibrillation Prediction in ESUS Patients with Hypergraph-based Pre-training.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Utilizing Large Language Models for Zero-Shot Medical Ontology Extension from Clinical Notes.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine · 2025
    Article
  7. A Survey on Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs for Biomedicine and Healthcare.KDD : proceedings. International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Attention heads of large language models.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yuzhang XieEmory University, USA.
Jiaying LuEmory University, USA.
Joyce HoEmory University, USA.
Fadi NahabEmory University, USA.
Xiao HuEmory University, USA.
Carl YangEmory University, USA.

Funding

Understanding Diabetes Heterogeneity via Mining Multimodality Interconnected DataK25DK135913 · NIDDK · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Ji Carl Yang · 2023 to 2026
$687k
NIDDK NIH HHS K25 DK135913
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Linking (aligning) biomedical concepts across diverse data sources enables various integrative analyses, but it is challenging due to the discrepancies in concept naming conventions. Various strategies have been developed to overcome this challenge, such as those based on string-matching rules, manually crafted thesauri, and machine learning models. However, these methods are constrained by limited prior biomedical knowledge and can hardly generalize beyond the limited amounts of rules, thesauri, or training samples. Recently, large language models (LLMs) have exhibited impressive results in diverse biomedical NLP tasks due to their unprecedentedly rich prior knowledge and strong zero-shot prediction abilities. However, LLMs suffer from issues including high costs, limited context length, and unreliable predictions. In this research, we propose PromptLink, a novel biomedical concept linking framework that leverages LLMs. It first employs a biomedical-specialized pre-trained language model to generate candidate concepts that can fit in the LLM context windows. Then it utilizes an LLM to link concepts through two-stage prompts, where the first-stage prompt aims to elicit the biomedical prior knowledge from the LLM for the concept linking task and the second-stage prompt enforces the LLM to reflect on its own predictions to further enhance their reliability. Empirical results on the concept linking task between two EHR datasets and an external biomedical KG demonstrate the effectiveness of PromptLink. Furthermore, PromptLink is a generic framework without reliance on additional prior knowledge, context, or training data, making it well-suited for concept linking across various types of data sources. The source code of this study is available at https://github.com/constantjxyz/PromptLink.

Indexed as

Biomedical Concept LinkingFew-Shot PromptingLarge Language Models for Resource-Constrained FieldRetrieve & Re-Rank

Identifiers

PMID40018364
PMCPMC11867735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.