ArticleBJA open2024
Deep learning models using intracranial and scalp EEG for predicting sedation level during emergence from anaesthesia.
Article in BJA open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07396727 (Health Professionals' Perceptions of the Subconscious Effects of Intraoperative Conversations in Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Health Professionals' Perceptions of the Subconscious Effects of Intraoperative Conversations in Patients: A Questionnaire-Based Study
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Operating Room Professionals' Awareness of Possible Unconscious Auditory Perception During General Anesthesia: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.Anesthesiology research and practice · 2026Article
- From static to dynamic: Artificial intelligence revolution in perioperative care through multimodal data fusion and closed-loop optimization.Journal of anesthesia and translational medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Maintaining an appropriate depth of anaesthesia is important for avoiding adverse effects from undermedication or overmedication during surgery. Electroencephalography (EEG) has become increasingly used to achieve this balance. Investigating the predictive power of intracranial EEG (iEEG) and scalp EEG for different levels of sedation could increase the utility of EEG monitoring. Methods: Simultaneous iEEG, scalp EEG, and Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) scores were recorded during emergence from anaesthesia in seven patients undergoing placement of intracranial electrodes for medically refractory epilepsy. A deep learning model was constructed to predict an OAA/S score of 0-2 Results: Combining scalp EEG and iEEG yielded significantly better prediction (AUC=0.795, Conclusions: The combination of iEEG and scalp EEG better predicted sedation level than either modality alone. The scalp EEG only model achieved a similar AUC to the combined model and maintained its performance in additional patients, suggesting that scalp EEG models are likely sufficient for real-time monitoring. Deep learning approaches using multiple leads to capture a wider area of brain activity may help augment existing EEG monitors for prediction of sedation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.