Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40018270›Full record

ArticleAccess microbiology2025

Reducing blood culture contamination: an environmental imperative.

Sophie Gregg, Niamh Purcell, Maeve Doyle, Grace Chan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Access microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sophie GreggDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-4679-5473
Niamh PurcellDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland.
Maeve DoyleDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland.
Grace ChanDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood culture (BC) investigation remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections. However, BC contamination can have clinical implications for the patient, cost implications for service providers and less well-documented, environmental impacts. Efforts to reduce BC contamination are a long-standing theme in quality improvement initiatives in emergency departments (EDs) and hospitals, prompted by hospital costs, healthcare inefficiencies and antimicrobial stewardship efforts. The WHO's global analysis of healthcare waste in the context of COVID-19 has reported that tens of thousands of tonnes of extra medical waste were produced from the response to the COVID-19 pandemic, basing its estimates on the quantity of personal protective equipment. Additionally, recent literature has also shown increased BC contamination rates during the COVID-19 pandemic. We performed a retrospective review of the trend of BC contamination during the COVID-19 pandemic in our institution's ED. We further discuss some of the potential implications of BC contamination, including potential environmental, economic and efficiency implications.

Indexed as

blood culturebloodstream infectioncoagulase-negative staphylococcuscontaminationenvironment

Identifiers

PMID40018270
PMCPMC11865496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.