Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40018240›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2024

Impact of patient-family physician language concordance on healthcare utilisation and mortality: a retrospective cohort study of home care recipients in Ontario, Canada.

Michael Reaume, Ricardo Batista, Ewa Sucha, Michael Pugliese, Rhiannon Roberts, Emily Rhodes, Emily Seale, Claire Kendall, Lise Bjerre, Louise Bouchard and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Experiences of culturally Deaf people with health care access and navigation in Ontario, Canada: a qualitative co-design study.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Michael ReaumeInternal Medicine, University of Manitoba Max Rady College of Medicine, Winnipeg, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9287-6098
Ricardo BatistaOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Ewa SuchaOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Michael PuglieseOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Rhiannon RobertsOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Emily RhodesOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Emily SealeUniversity of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Claire KendallInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lise BjerreInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Louise BouchardInstitut du Savoir Montfort, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Sharon JohnstonUniversity of Ottawa Department of Family Medicine, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Manish SoodOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Denis Prud'hommeInstitut du Savoir Montfort, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Douglas ManuelUniversity of Ottawa Department of Family Medicine, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Peter TanuseputroOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: As the world's linguistic diversity continues to increase at an unprecedented rate, a growing proportion of patients will be at risk of experiencing language barriers in primary care settings. We sought to examine whether patient-family physician language concordance in a primary care setting is associated with lower rates of hospital-based healthcare utilisation and mortality. Methods: We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of 497 227 home care recipients living in Ontario, Canada. Patient language was obtained from home care assessments while physician language was obtained from the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario. We defined primary care as language concordant when patients and their rostered family physicians shared a mutually intelligible language, and we defined all other primary care as language discordant. The primary outcomes were Emergency Department (ED) visits, hospitalisations and death within 1 year of index home care assessment. Results: Compared with non-English, non-French speakers who received language-discordant primary care, those who received language-concordant primary care experienced fewer ED visits (53.1% vs 57.5%; p<0.01), fewer hospitalisations (35.0% vs 37.6%; p<0.01) and less mortality (14.4% vs 16.6%; p<0.01) during the study period. In multivariable regression analyses, non-English, non-French speakers had lower risks of ED visits (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.91, 95% CI 0.88 to 0.94), hospitalisations (aHR 0.94, 95% CI 0.90 to 0.98) and death (aHR 0.87, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.93) when they received language-concordant primary care. For francophones, the risk of experiencing an ED visit, a hospitalisation or death was not impacted by the language of their family physician. Conclusions: Patient-family physician language concordance is associated with a lower risk of adverse outcomes in non-English and non-French speakers. Optimising the delivery of language-concordant care could potentially result in significant decreases in the use of acute healthcare services and mortality at the population level.

Indexed as

Community HealthPatient HarmPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID40018240
PMCPMC11812866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.