ArticleBMJ public health2024
Responsiveness of services rendered at primary healthcare facilities of Bharatpur, Nepal: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Postoperative pain management satisfaction and its determinants among orthopedic patients in Northwest Ethiopia: a multicenter cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Health system responsiveness for healthcare services at health facilities in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026Article
- Exploring the Effect of Doctor-Nurse Collaboration on Overall Satisfaction Among the Older Patients: A Moderated Mediation Model of Responsiveness and Environment.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- Acceptability of mass drug administration for lymphatic filariasis in Baglung Municipality of Nepal: A mixed-method study.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Assessing patient satisfaction with practitioner communication: patient-centered care, hospital environment and patient trust in the public hospitals.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Awareness and compliance with tobacco control policies among retailers near schools in Arghakhanchi, Nepal: A mixed- methods study.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Key Predictors of Patient Satisfaction and Loyalty in Saudi Healthcare Facilities: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Responsiveness of services refers to the way healthcare systems and providers interact with patients and how well they meet patients' non-clinical expectations and needs. The responsiveness is a crucial aspect of a well-functioning health system while primary healthcare is considered as its foundational cornerstone. However, in low and middle-income countries, there are numerous obstacles to its efficient operation and a very limited understanding of the concept of service responsiveness. This study aimed to assess the responsiveness of services and identify associated factors at primary healthcare facilities of Bharatpur, Nepal. Methods: A facility-based cross-sectional study was carried out among 358 patients visiting outpatient department (OPD) of primary healthcare facilities of Bharatpur. A pretested structured interview schedule was used to conduct a face-to-face interview to obtain the information per the study's objective. Univariate as well as bivariable and multivariable logistic regressions were carried out to obtain the result per our objectives. Results: The overall performance of the responsiveness of services was 74.6% (95% CI 70.1 to 78.8), dignity being the highest performing domain (97.2%) and choice being the lowest (22.6%). Respondents aged more than or equal to 50 (adjusted OR (AOR)=4.107, 95% CI 1.28 to 13.14), those who are satisfied with the service (AOR=7.02, 95% CI 3.21 to 15.36), those who perceive high quality of care (AOR=5.69, 95% CI 2.54 to 12.73) and those who did not have to pay for transportation (AOR=4.63, 95% CI 2.20 to 9.72) showed higher responsiveness. Conclusion: The primary healthcare facilities of Bharatpur, Nepal demonstrated nearly three-quarters of the respondents reporting good responsiveness of services at OPD. To further enhance the level of responsiveness, strengthening the referral networks, empowering patients in decision-making and prioritising patient satisfaction and quality of services can help.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.