Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40018220›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2024

Using systems mapping within the process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial of the ACE active ageing programme in England and Wales.

Nick Cavill, Colin Greaves, Katie E Chatwin, Zsofia Szekeres, Amy Davies, Helen Hawley-Hague, Diane Crone, Janet Withall, Janice Thompson, Afroditi Stathi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nick CavillUniversity of Bath, Bath, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3399-3219
Colin GreavesUniversity of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Katie E ChatwinUniversity of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Zsofia SzekeresCardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK.
Amy DaviesUniversity of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Helen Hawley-HagueUniversity of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Diane CroneCardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK.
Janet WithallUniversity of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Janice ThompsonUniversity of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Afroditi StathiUniversity of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: System mapping has mainly been used to develop theories and understanding of complex systems; to hypothesise how an intervention might work in a complex system or to inform intervention development. There are a few examples of the use of system mapping as part of process evaluation. In this paper, we describe an innovative approach to using system mapping as part of the process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial of the Active, Connected, Engaged (ACE) community-based active ageing programme. Method: Ten participatory workshops were held across three of the ACE sites (Cardiff, Stoke-on-Trent and Manchester, UK). These involved over 100 participants, volunteers and stakeholders (from National Health Service, statutory and voluntary sectors). Their aim was to gather area-specific information on participants' barriers and facilitators to physical activity and the needs of peer volunteers and service providers; and create 'baseline' system maps before the launch of the programme in the three areas of ACE delivery. Results: System maps were produced showing the main outcome (physical activity) and the interactions between the key motivators and barriers described by older people, as well as ideas from stakeholders and volunteers about how these barriers can be addressed. Findings led to refinements to ACE intervention processes and the study's logic model. Conclusions: System mapping helped to refine the ACE processes and fine-tune the logic model. The value of this approach will increase in the next phase when it will be used to explore any changes to the physical activity system including changes to stakeholders' ways of working and collaborating to tackle barriers to activity following the completion of the ACE trial. Trial registration number: ISRCTN17660493.

Indexed as

Age FactorsCommunity HealthPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID40018220
PMCPMC11812748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.