Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40018150›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2024

Challenges and enablers for scaling up interventions targeting non-communicable diseases: a qualitative study applying the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to 19 research projects worldwide.

Anusha Ramani-Chander, Amanda G Thrift, Josefien van Olmen, Edwin Wouters, Peter Delobelle, Rajesh Vedanthan, J Jaime Miranda, Stephen Sherwood, Helena Teede, Rohina Joshi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Anusha Ramani-ChanderDepartment of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2461-7139
Amanda G ThriftDepartment of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Josefien van OlmenDepartment of Family Health and Population Medicine, University of Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Edwin WoutersDepartment of Sociology, Centre for Population, Family & Health, University of Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Peter DelobelleChronic Disease Initiative of Africa, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa.
Rajesh VedanthanDepartment of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
J Jaime MirandaCRONICAS Center of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Stephen SherwoodFundacion Ekorural, Quito, Ecuador.
Helena TeedeMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation (MCHRI), Monash University in partnership with Monash Health, Clayton, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Rohina JoshiSchool of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3374-401X
Global Alliance for Chronic Diseases Upscaling Working Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Scaling up interventions targeting non-communicable diseases (NCDs) is a global health priority, and implementation research can contribute to that effort. In 2019, the Global Alliance for Chronic Diseases funded 27 implementation research studies to improve evidence for scaling up interventions targeting prevention and/or control of hypertension and/or diabetes in low-resource settings. We examined these studies to improve the understanding of the implementation factors, including challenges and facilitators, that influence the early implementation phase of scale-up research projects targeting NCDs. Methods: This qualitative study was undertaken between August 2020 and July 2021. 43 semi-structured interviews were conducted with project investigators, implementers and policymakers, across 19 diverse scale-up projects, being implemented in 20 countries. The transcripts were inductively, open-coded using thematic analysis. Generated themes were mapped systematically to four out of five domain categorisations of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR); the innovation domain fell outside the scope of this study. Results: Highlighted findings using CFIR are: (i) outer setting: influence of politics, lack of coordination between government departments and differing agendas towards NCDs hindered implementation while reliable and trustworthy government connections proved useful; (ii) inner setting: commitment of resources for implementation was a challenge while research capacity, work culture and trustworthy networks facilitated implementation; (iii) individuals: high-level stakeholder support and leadership was essential; (iv) process: extensive time and efforts required for stakeholder engagement towards local contextualisation was challenging, while collaborating, joint reflection, effective communication and adaptation facilitated. COVID-19 provided both challenges and opportunities and these varied depending on the intervention characteristics and study objectives. Conclusion: Researchers supporting the scale-up of complex interventions targeting NCDs need to leverage on existing trusting relationships and foster equitable stakeholder partnerships through research. Interpersonal skills and good communication are essential complements to research expertise and must be considered during capacity building.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesCommunity HealthPublic HealthSocial Medicine

Identifiers

PMID40018150
PMCPMC11812842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.