ArticleBMJ public health2024
Exploring associations of financial well-being with health behaviours and physical and mental health: a cross-sectional study among US adults.
Article in BMJ public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Influence of Resource Constraints on Risk-Related Conversations With Specialists Among a Community-Based Sample of Women at High Risk for Breast Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- The 6-item InCharge financial distress/financial wellbeing (IFDFW-6) scale: Development and validation in pharmacy and epidemiology research.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2026Article
- Integrated Wellbeing: Illustrating the Benefits of Approaching Domain-Specific Development Within an Integrated Framework.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Health disparities exist across socioeconomic status levels, yet empirical evidence between financial well-being (FWB) and health are limited. Methods: This cross-sectional study combined data from 25 370 adults aged ≥18 years in the 2019 National Health Interview Survey with estimated household FWB scores from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's 2016 National Financial Well-being Survey. FWB associations with health service visits, biometric screenings, smoking status, body mass index and physical and mental conditions were tested using age-adjusted, sex-adjusted and health insurance coverage-adjusted linear regression analysis. Results: In 2019, the mean FWB for US adults was 56.1 (range 14 (worse) to 95 (best)). With increasing time since the last health service visit or screening, FWB was increasingly lower compared with adults with visits or screenings <1 year (≥10 years or 'never', FWB ranged from -1 (blood sugar check) to -6.5 (dental examination/cleaning) points). FWB was lower with declining general health status (excellent (reference), very good (-0.5 points), good (-3.4 points) and fair/poor (-6.6 points)). Adults with physical health conditions had FWB lower than adults without (range -0.4 (high cholesterol) to -4.6 (disability) points). FWB were lower in adults who have ever been diagnosed with anxiety disorder (-1.8 points) or depression (-2 points). Adults managing their anxiety or depression (no/minimal symptoms currently) had greater FWB (anxiety: 3 points and depression: 4.1 points) than those with symptoms. Conclusion: Given the observed associations between FWB and health-related measures, it is crucial to consider FWB in primary and secondary health prevention efforts, recognising the relationship between economics, health and wellness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.