Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40018108›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2024

The process of developing a joint theory of change across three global entities: can this help to make their efforts to strengthen capacity for implementation research more effective?

Garry Aslanyan, Kabir Sheikh, Marta Feletto, Pascal Launois, Mahnaz Vahedi, Vanessa Brizuela, Anna Thorson, Sara Begg, Susie Crossman, Imelda Bates

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Garry AslanyanUNICEF/UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Kabir SheikhUniversity College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4755-2075
Marta FelettoAlliance For Health Policy and Systems Research, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Pascal LaunoisUNICEF/UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Mahnaz VahediUNICEF/UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Vanessa BrizuelaUNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4860-0828
Anna ThorsonUNICEF/UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Sara BeggCentre for Capacity Research, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Susie CrossmanCentre for Capacity Research, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5274-1463
Imelda BatesCentre for Capacity Research, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: A theory of change is a visual representation of the pathway by which a programme anticipates it will achieve its goal. It usually starts with discussions around the goal and works backwards through outcomes and outputs to activities. Methods: We used a theory of change to improve coherence across three research entities at the WHO. Part of the remit of all three entities is to strengthen capacity in low-income and middle-income countries for implementation research. Results: Representatives from the three entities were able to formulate a joint goal for strengthening capacity in implementation research. They identified three pathways by which this could be achieved: (a) conducting implementation research, (b) strengthening implementation research systems and (c) using implementation research for public health priorities. Conclusion: The process of developing the theory of change and the logic framework it created, provided a means to track progress towards the goal and to guide improvements in programmes within their lifetime. The process we used to develop the theory of change and the pathways to achieve the joint goal are adaptable and could be used by other organisations that also aim to strengthen research capacity. This would lead to more coherence, better translation of research findings into decision-making and ultimately improvements in public health.

Indexed as

Community HealthPublic HealthSocial Medicine

Identifiers

PMID40018108
PMCPMC11816388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.