ArticleBMJ public health2024
Exposure to needlestick injury among healthcare support staff in Greater Accra, Ghana: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prevalence and predictors of percutaneous injuries among health workers in Ghana: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to determine the prevalence and predisposing factors of a needlestick injury (NSI) among healthcare support staff in the Greater Accra region, Ghana. Methods: An analytical cross-sectional survey was carried out from 30 January 2023 to 31 May 2023, involving 10 major health facilities. A multistage sampling method was adopted. The data analyses were performed using STATA V.15 software. χ Results: The study was conducted among 149 healthcare support staff. The 1-year exposure to NSI was 68 (45.6%) (95% CI (37.5% to 54.0%)). Being a healthcare assistant (APR=2.81 (95% CI 1.85 to 4.25)), being married (APR=0.39 (95% CI 0.25 to 0.63)), being a supervisor (APR=0.34 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.57)), had training on standard precaution (APR=0.27 (95% CI 0.14 to 0.57)) and non-existence of needlestick reporting system (APR=0.46 (95% CI 0.29 to 0.74)) were significantly associated with NSI. Conclusion: The prevalence of NSI was high compared with other regional studies, and the risk factors were related to sociodemographic, behavioural and organisational factors. The study recommends guidelines that are geared towards NSI exposure among healthcare support staff.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.