Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40018099›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2024

Chasing cancer: does the social-to-medical spending ratio relate to cancer incidence and mortality in Canadian provinces? A retrospective cohort study.

Cameron MacLellan, Paul Kershaw, Ronald D Kneebone, Lindsay McLaren, Tony Reiman, Robin Urquhart, Daniel J Dutton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cameron MacLellanCommunity Health & Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6641-305X
Paul KershawSchool of Population and Public Health, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Ronald D KneeboneEconomics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Lindsay McLarenDepartment of Community Health Sciences Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8435-4804
Tony ReimanDivision of Medical Oncology, Dalhousie University Faculty of Medicine, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Robin UrquhartCommunity Health & Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Daniel J DuttonCommunity Health & Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Cancer is the leading cause of death in Canada, and cases are expected to rise by 83% between 2012 and 2042. Jurisdictions with higher ratios of social-to-medical spending exhibit better population health outcomes; however, the connection between the ratio and both cancer incidence and mortality is not well established. We aim to determine the association between the ratio and both age-standardised cancer incidence and mortality. Methods: Using linear regressions with provincial and yearly fixed effects, we measured associations between the ratio and incidence of the four most common cancers in Canada (ie, lung and bronchus, colorectal, breast and prostate cancer), and mortality from any cancer, from 1992 to 2017 (incidence) and 2000 to 2019 (mortality). Results: A one-cent increase in social spending for each dollar spent on medical services was significantly associated with a decrease in colorectal (-0.2%), breast (-0.1%), and prostate cancer (-0.6%). The relationship is statistically insignificant and negligible for lung cancer incidence and cancer mortality. Conclusion: The ratio was significantly associated with a decrease in three out of four cancer incidence categories, but not mortality. This implies that, consistent with the social determinants of health, preventing cancer incidence might be a function of social spending, whereas medical spending is more relevant for individuals already diagnosed with cancer. This analysis points to the importance of a health-in-all-policies perspective, as social spending might be more important for population health than spending on the medical care system. We provide evidence that morbidity measures are responsive to the ratio, building on a literature focused on mortality.

Indexed as

economicsEpidemiologyPrimary Prevention

Identifiers

PMID40018099
PMCPMC11812898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.