ArticleJournal of pain research2025
Functional Ultrasound Imaging Reveals Activation Properties of Clinical Spinal Cord Stimulation Therapy Programming.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Review of the Prospera Spinal Cord Stimulation System with Multiphase Stimulation and Proactive Care.Current pain and headache reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) therapy is an established treatment for chronic neuropathic pain, but methodological limitations have prohibited detailed investigation of activation patterns it produces in the SC. Functional ultrasound imaging (fUS) is an emerging technology that monitors local hemodynamic changes in the brain with high sensitivity and spatiotemporal resolution that are tightly coupled to neural functional activity. In this study, fUS was used to investigate neuromodulation patterns produced by clinical SCS paradigms in an ovine model that enabled testing with implanted clinical hardware. Materials and Methods: Activation of local superficial dorsal horn (SDH) regions during SCS therapy was evaluated using fUS to detect hemodynamic changes in spinal blood volume (∆SBV). Standard SCS leads were percutaneously implanted midline overlying the dura of the exposed cord (T12-L1) to enable stimulation and recording evoked compound action potentials (eCAPs). Hemodynamic activation patterns were mapped across two vertebral segments at amplitudes between 100-200% eCAP threshold for conventional tonic, multiphase, burst, high frequency and multi-frequency SCS paradigms. Results: SCS stimulation resulted in significant activation of the SDH in differing patterns across two vertebral segments. The magnitude and volume of ∆SBV increased at higher amplitudes and was typically maximal in the SDH regions underlying the active electrodes. Therapy mode significantly influenced total area and depth of ∆SBV. Multiphase therapy produced the largest area of ∆SBV followed by multi-frequency and other SCS modes. Multiphase therapy also produced the greatest depth of ∆SBV followed by multi-frequency and burst therapies. Conclusion: This work demonstrates that fUS can effectively measure SCS neural response patterns in the pain processing laminae of a large animal model implanted with a clinical SCS system. Hemodynamic responses in the SC varied significantly across SCS therapy modes, with multiphase stimulation providing a greater area of coverage and depth of response versus other common stimulation types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.