ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the stroke exercise preference inventory.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: While studies on version adaptation, validity, and reliability are common, no tools exist in Turkish literature to assess exercise preferences in stroke patients. This research aimed to translate the Stroke Exercise Preference Inventory (SEPI) into Turkish and evaluate its validity and reliability in stroke patients. Methods: Ninety stroke patients completed the SEPI, Exercise Benefits/ Barriers Scale (EBBS), Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ-2), Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale (SSQoLS), and Frenchay Activities Index (FAI). The SEPI was translated into Turkish using a standard forward-backward translation process. Psychometric properties such as structural and construct validity, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency were assessed. Results: Reliability analysis demonstrated high internal consistency for SEPI-13, with Cronbach's Discussion: The Turkish SEPI is a reliable and valid tool for assessing exercise preferences in stroke patients, aiding their rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.