Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40017983›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2025

Assessing the impact of antimicrobial resistance policies on antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance-associated mortality in children and adults in low and middle-income countries: a global analysis.

Kyaw Zay Ya, Jay Patel, Günther Fink

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Bacteriophage pharmacodynamics studied in anJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Social Determinants of Health and Antibiotic Consumption.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kyaw Zay YaDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2681-5980
Jay PatelCentre for Population Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh Usher Institute, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8188-6784
Günther FinkDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7525-3668

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a major threat to global health security today. In recent years, many low and middle-income countries (LMICs) have implemented policies to optimise antibiotic use in both formal and informal healthcare settings. However, there is limited evidence on the effectiveness of these national efforts in LMICs. Methods: We investigated the empirical relationship between national policies aimed at restricting antibiotic use and actual antibiotic consumption in 138 LMICs. Data on national policies were obtained from the Tripartite AMR Country Self-Assessment Survey (TrACSS) as well as from the Global Survey of Experts on AMR (GSEAR). Seven independent variables relating to AMR policies were evaluated. Outcomes included the proportion of children receiving antibiotics for lower respiratory tract infections and diarrhoea (specific to paediatric populations), along with total antibiotic consumption and AMR-associated mortality in general populations. Results: Our analysis of 138 LMICs found wide variation in antibiotic use between countries and regions. We observed strong evidence of negative association (mean difference MD=-0.150, 95% CI (-0.2593 to -0.0407)) between the presence of regulatory or legislative policies that ban over-the-counter sales of antibiotics and the proportion of children receiving antibiotic drugs for lower respiratory tract infection. Furthermore, stronger AMR governance was associated with reduced total antibiotic consumption at the country level (MD=-1.259, 95% CI (-2.297 to -0.2216)). No associations were found between other policy variables and antibiotic use or mortality. Conclusion: The results presented here suggest that there is some evidence of an empirical relationship between national policies aimed at limiting over-the-counter antibiotic sales and actual antibiotic usage practices. Further policy effectiveness research will be needed to better understand the true impact of government measures. In general, a multifaceted approach will likely be needed to fight AMR and preserve antibiotics' effectiveness, including evidence-based policies, targeted education and research.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringPopulation SurveillancePublic Health

Identifiers

PMID40017983
PMCPMC11843486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.