ArticleBMJ public health2025
Understanding barriers to young people's utilisation of sexual and reproductive health services in Asia-Pacific countries: a qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis.
Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adolescent sexual and reproductive health and rights policy for ethnic minority girls in Vietnam: a qualitative study with policy makers and service providers.Global health action · 2026Article
- The use of adolescent standardized patients to teach psychosocial risk assessment and its impact on medical student self‑efficacy.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Barriers to access and use of sexual reproductive health and human immunodeficiency virus services among adolescent girls and young women in Maputo City, Mozambique.African journal of reproductive health · 2026Article
- Barriers and facilitators to sexual and reproductive healthcare access for women with severe mental illness in low- and middle-income countries: A qualitative systematic review and meta-aggregation.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractIntroduction: Based on the United Nations' sustainable development goals, universal access to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services should be attained by 2030. Yet, large inequalities in adolescent SRH knowledge and service use still exist both within and between countries. The goal of this study was to identify and synthesise published qualitative research on factors affecting young people's utilisation of SRH services in Asia-Pacific countries. Methods: We systematically searched five electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Web of Science) for qualitative studies reporting the experiences, attitudes and views of young people (aged 10-24 years) regarding the utilisation of SRH services in Asia-Pacific countries. We assessed the quality of identified studies using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme qualitative checklist and employed a thematic synthesis approach for the data analysis. Results: We included 31 articles that reported the experiences of over 1800 young people from 15 different countries. Thematic synthesis identified six descriptive themes that captured factors influencing SRH service utilisation: (1) navigating puberty; (2) knowledge and beliefs about SRH; (3) embarrassment and confidentiality concerns; (4) low decision-making autonomy; (5) traditional practices and religious beliefs; and (6) social and gender norms. Based on these, we developed an overarching analytical theme, 'trapped in a legacy of shame', which highlights the role of shame as a key emotion associated with young people's utilisation of SRH services. Conclusion: Our findings point towards the necessity of integrating shame-sensitive approaches and a social norms perspective in interventions aiming to improve young people's SRH outcomes in Asia-Pacific countries. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023389653.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.