ArticleBMJ public health2025
Perceived effectiveness and recommendations from a childbirth quality assurance and improvement programme in India's private sector: a qualitative evaluation using the RE-AIM framework.
Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Previous studies have revealed inconsistent quality of care in India's private sector, where nearly one in three facility births take place. Manyata is a quality assurance and improvement programme launched in 2016 by the Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecological Societies of India (FOGSI) that provides training, mentorship and accreditation to private maternity facilities. We aimed to understand participants' motivations for joining or not joining, the perceived value of Manyata and recommendations for sustainment and scale. Methods: We aimed to sample 238 Manyata participants for semi-structured, in-depth interviews between February and July 2021. Participants included facility owners, nurses, FOGSI quality assessors, programme implementers and Manyata leaders. Data were coded and analysed using a deductive and inductive process. Codes were mapped to the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework, which we expanded to include scale. Results: We interviewed 185 programme participants. Maternity facility owners joined Manyata due to its affiliation with FOGSI, encouragement from peers and the desire to standardise care and train their staff. Barriers to joining included cost, unclear value and little motivation to improve practice. Participants most valued Manyata for improving staff competency, quality of care, standardised care processes and staff satisfaction. Participants felt that continuous training, mentorship and quality assurance would be necessary to maintain Manyata over time, and Manyata could and should be scaled across India and to other countries. Conclusion: Strategies for engaging with the private sector should include building strategic partnerships and messaging a value proposition that emphasises training, standardised care processes and improved quality of care. A blended virtual and in-person model may be leveraged for ongoing training and quality assurance and to scale across contexts. Our evaluation of Manyata distills tangible lessons that policymakers, professional societies and public health practitioners can use to bridge the quality gap in their own private-sector maternity systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.