ArticleBMJ public health2025
Assessing the value-added contributions of community health workers and communities to early child development: a longitudinal study in a low-income setting.
Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Health worker support for early learning, responsive caregiving, and safety and security: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Early child development (ECD) programs in low-resource settings can be effective when delivered through community health workers (CHWs), but there are significant challenges when moving to scale. This analysis aimed to determine the value-added, or relative effectiveness, of CHWs and communities on ECD outcomes within a home-visiting trial and examine associations between observable characteristics of the CHW or community and value-added. Methods: We analysed data from the four treatment arms of a cluster-randomised trial conducted in 100 communities in rural Madagascar from 2014 to 2016. CHWs (one per cluster) and enrolled children (0-12 months) were surveyed at baseline and 2 years later. Child development scores were assessed using the Ages and Stages Questionnaire-Inventory (ASQ-I) and were internally age-standardised. We determined value-added by estimating CHW/community-level fixed effects on ASQ-I Z-score trajectories (change from baseline to endline), conditional on baseline ASQ-I Z-score and child and household characteristics. We also assessed associations between value-added and observable CHW and community-level characteristics. Results: We analysed data from 1456 children present at baseline and endline. CHW/community fixed effects explained 26% of ASQ-I trajectory variance and estimates ranged from -1.68 SD to 1.31 SD. CHWs who had another income-generating position were associated with a 0.54 SD (95% CI 0.22, 0.87) increase in ASQ-I Z-score from baseline to endline. Greater increases in children's ASQ-I Z-scores were also associated with communities that had better healthcare, education and transportation infrastructure and were less geographically dispersed. Conclusions: Children gained or lost over one standard deviation of ASQ-I Z-score depending on the community and CHW where they lived. Children's development trajectories benefitted from CHWs involved in an external income-generating activity and communities with better access to healthcare, education, and transportation. Careful consideration of the contexts in which child development interventions are implemented and potential correlates of improved CHW performance are crucial for improved outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.