Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40017949›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2025

Routes to social prescribing outside National Health Service (NHS) structures: a systematic map.

Emma Hazeldine, Sophie Westwood, Mohammad Hassannezhad, Stephanie Tierney, Lucy Gavens, Kerryn Husk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emma HazeldineNIHR South West Peninsula ARC, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0152-6322
Sophie WestwoodUniversity of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon, UK.
Mohammad HassannezhadQueen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Stephanie TierneyUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Lucy GavensLincolnshire County Council, Lincoln, UK.
Kerryn HuskNIHR South West Peninsula ARC, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Social prescribing, linking to community-based interventions to support individuals' health and well-being, has become established across social medicine in the UK. Currently, most of the evidence and knowledge about how social prescribing pathways' function focuses on primary care, and we know less about how social prescribing operates outside of these structures. This review explored the evidence concerning non-health service delivered social prescribing with a view to developing guidance that would support social prescribing pathways that function outside of the health service framework. Design: This paper reports a systematic mapping review of evidence concerning how community-based social prescribing pathways were delivered, exploring what these looked like, what needed to be in place for these to function, what outcomes were measured and how could non-health service pathways be supported to deliver these outcomes. The review searched database and grey sources and synthesised findings relating to how social prescribing pathways' function. Setting: Community settings, outside of formal National Health Service (NHS) structures without statutory service input. Participants: All participants that experienced pathways were included; no limits were applied. Interventions: Non-NHS social prescribing pathways that included the core components of social prescribing. Main outcome measures: Rich descriptions of functions of pathways. Results: This mapping review included 17 studies. The synthesis indicated that NHS and non-NHS social prescribing pathways are intertwined and mutually reliant, such that it was neither sensible nor valuable to view them as separate. Conclusions: Our review provides further evidence for social prescribing as a concept, variable across all components, rather than a single, coherent model. While there exists a 'core' health service pathway, we suggest that further work should be done with those delivering services to understand the roles and functions that contribute but may not presently be funded.

Indexed as

Community HealthPublic HealthPublic Health Practice

Identifiers

PMID40017949
PMCPMC11816873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.