Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40017944›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2025

Cross-sectional analysis of e-cigarettes, combustible tobacco and their dual use with binge drinking among college students in the USA.

Rose Thornquist, Fares Qeadan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rose ThornquistLoyola University Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Fares QeadanLoyola University Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3376-220X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Tobacco use is a long-standing epidemic that has caused millions of premature deaths. Electronic cigarette use is rising among young adults, yet few studies have included combustible tobacco, e-cigarettes and their dual use in an analysis of binge drinking among college students. This study aims to calculate the associations between these three forms of tobacco use and binge drinking among college students. Methods: This cross-sectional study used data from 332 721 college students from the American College Health Association-National College Health Assessment survey. Tobacco use was organised into four groups: no tobacco use, e-cigarette use only, combustible tobacco use only and dual use of e-cigarettes and combustible tobacco. Binge drinking was a binary indication of whether students had engaged in binge drinking in the last 2 weeks. Multiple logistic regression was employed to examine the relationship between tobacco use and binge drinking, adjusting for demographic factors and constructs of the integrated behavioural model. Results: Each tobacco use group had significantly higher odds of binge drinking compared with students who did not use tobacco. Students who engaged in dual tobacco use had significantly higher odds of binge drinking compared with exclusive combustible tobacco use (adjusted OR, aOR=2.41, 95% CI: 2.29, 2.53) and exclusive e-cigarette use (aOR=1.79, 95% CI: 1.71, 1.86). Conclusion: The strong relationship between dual tobacco use and binge drinking among college students warrants further investigation into the aetiology and clinical manifestations of this emerging coupled substance use behaviour among the next generation of adults.

Indexed as

Cross-Sectional StudiesEpidemiologyPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID40017944
PMCPMC11865762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.