ArticleBMJ public health2025
Investigating the general effects of different types of toluene exposure on the health of workers: an integrative review of the literature.
Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Multiple chemical sensitivity triggered by an automobile mechanic's indirect exposure to volatile organic compounds in the Republic of Korea: a case report.Annals of occupational and environmental medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This integrative review aims to evaluate the available empirical and theoretical literature on the effects caused by different types of occupational toluene exposure on the health of workers. We aim to guide future research, legislation, and guidelines with evidence-based recommendations on toluene exposure. Design: An integrative review of the literature. Data sources: A systematic search strategy was undertaken across five electronic databases; PubMed, Scopus, Medline, CINAHL and ScienceDirect. Furthermore, grey literature was incorporated through hand-searching databases, Google Scholar, open-access engines and Google Advanced Search tool, among other tools. Eligibility criteria: Studies investigating the effects of occupational toluene exposure between 2010 and July 2023 were included. Inclusion criteria included full-text English articles, workers aged 18-65, and studies with co-exposures to benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene or volatile organic compound if direct findings to toluene were reported. Notable exclusion criteria were non-human studies, pregnant women, paediatric and geriatric populations, and studies addressing toluene abuse and not occupational exposure. Data extraction and synthesis: 27 studies met the eligibility criteria and were appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Data were systematically extracted, guiding the synthesis of various themes, namely acute exposure effects, chronic exposure effects, short-term effects, long-term effects, low-dose effects, high-dose effects and reversible versus irreversible effects. Results: The review demonstrated that occupational toluene exposure impacts health differently depending on the nature and context of the exposure. Effects can arise in both acute and chronic scenarios, with outcomes that vary by duration, dose and whether the effects are reversible or irreversible. Conclusions: The results demonstrate that toluene exposure can cause a wide range of effects based on the type of occupational toluene exposure. These findings can be used to update current guidelines on the recommended threshold limit for toluene exposure. Furthermore, strategies such as implementing mandatory personal protective equipment, improving ventilation and educating workers on the risks of toluene exposure can be put in place to mitigate the risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.