Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40017927›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2025

'Involve those who are managing these outbreaks': stakeholders' perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of clinical management guidelines for high-consequence infectious diseases in Uganda-a thematic network analysis.

Olive Kabajaasi, Stefan Schilling, Mathias Akugizibwe, Peter W Horby, Peter Hart, Louise Sigfrid, Shevin T Jacob

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Olive Kabajaasi *Walimu, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0001-9300-0066
Stefan Schilling *Psychology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8270-6335
Mathias AkugizibweSocial Sciences Department, Medical Research Council, Entebbe, Uganda.
Peter W HorbyPandemic Sciences Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Peter HartWellcome Trust, London, UK.
Louise SigfridPandemic Sciences Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Shevin T JacobWalimu, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0003-2425-9394

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Prior research highlighting the complexity of clinical management guidelines' (CMGs) implementation during high consequence infectious disease (HCID) outbreaks has suggested that limited access to treatments and equipment and substantial issues regarding availability, inclusivity, quality and applicability hinders the implementation of CMGs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This in-depth case study of Uganda-coincidentally occurring during the 2022 Sudan virus disease outbreak-aimed to explore contextual and supplementary factors which hinder or facilitate CMG development and implementation. Methods: Between August and December 2022, 43 interviews were conducted with medical personnel, consultant physicians, case managers and Uganda Ministry of Health officials. Interviews were analysed using a thematic network analysis approach to visualise thematic codes in qualitative data and highlight inherent relationships between codes. Results: Six thematic topics emerged as the main barriers to the implementation of CMGs during HCID outbreaks in Uganda: (1) deficient content and slow updates of CMGs; (2) scarce resources and healthcare disparities; (3) slow dissemination and limited access to guidelines; (4) improvisation of patient care (5) lack of training for healthcare workers (HCWs); and (6) limited pandemic preparedness and response infrastructure. Codes most strongly linked to facilitators and suggestions included: (1) HCW training in CMG implementation; (2) adequate resourcing; (3) involvement of personnel with prior HCID response experience in CMG development and (4) improvements in access to CMGs. Conclusions: By illustrating linkages to resource constraints, healthcare disparities, and limited surveillance and referral infrastructure, our study displays how insufficient training, patchy dissemination and slow updating exacerbate many of the underlying difficulties for CMG implementation in LMIC contexts. Findings offer valuable insights for LMICs to improve HCID outbreak responses and inform implementation of CMGs in future HCID outbreaks, where evidence is often initially limited. Recommendations to enhance CMG implementation are provided.

Indexed as

COVID-19Disease OutbreakseducationPublic Health Practicestandards

Identifiers

PMID40017927
PMCPMC11843484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.