Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40017890›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2023

Social media as a public health tool during the UK mpox outbreak: a qualitative study of stakeholders' experiences.

Jaime Garcia-Iglesias, Tom May, Martyn Pickersgill, Jeremy Williams, Maurice Nagington, Sophie Buijsen, Ciara McHugh, Jeremy Horwood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jaime Garcia-IglesiasCentre for Biomedicine, Self and Society, Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8841-5635
Tom MayNIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Martyn PickersgillCentre for Biomedicine, Self and Society, Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Jeremy WilliamsInternational Public Policy Observatory, UCL, London, UK.
Maurice NagingtonSchool of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Sophie BuijsenScience, Technology and Innovation Studies, School of Social and Political Science, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Ciara McHughMitchell Institute for Global Peace, Security and Justice, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Jeremy HorwoodNIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This rapid response research explored the experiences of key stakeholder groups during the 2022-2023 mpox outbreak in the UK, and in particular, the use of social media as a tool of health promotion. The project sought to identify key lessons learnt for future epidemic and pandemic preparedness. Methods: The qualitative study employed online focus groups and interviews with key stakeholder communities, including activists, clinicians, policy actors and individuals with lived experience of mpox. N=29 stakeholders participated. Data were subject to framework analysis, with findings discussed and conclusions reached through a face-to-face analysis workshop. Results: Participants emphasised the significant role of social media, particularly Twitter (now called X), in the response to the mpox outbreak. Several benefits were highlighted, including disseminating relevant information, tackling stigma and generating/advancing advocacy and collaboration. However, participants also pointed out challenges associated with social media; in particular, its reliance on pre-existing networks and associated dynamics of exclusion, and the presence of misinformation. Conclusion: Social media played an important role in informal and purposive health promotion during the 2022-2023 mpox outbreak, while also presenting significant challenges regarding misinformation and exclusion. We recommend that preparedness for infectious disease outbreaks must consider the role of social media as key tools for not only the dissemination of health promotion messages, but also for real-time collaboration on message development. Special attention should be paid to ensuring collaboration and dissemination strategies are explicitly orientated towards promoting the inclusion of underserved groups.

Indexed as

Communicable Disease ControlDisease OutbreaksPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID40017890
PMCPMC11812727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.