Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40017855›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2023

Securitising public health emergencies: a qualitative examination of the origins of military intervention in Sierra Leone's Ebola Epidemic.

Samuel T Boland, Susannah Mayhew, Dina Balabanova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samuel T BolandCentre for Universal Health, Chatham House, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6470-5470
Susannah MayhewDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2433-3809
Dina BalabanovaDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7163-3428

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The 2013-2016 West Africa Ebola Epidemic remains the largest recorded Ebola outbreak. In response to the escalating number of cases in Sierra Leone in the summer and early autumn of 2014, the British Armed Forces and Republic of Sierra Leone Armed Forces intervened in support of the outbreak response. Among other contributions, the militaries established and subsequently helped to lead a national network of bespoke (and inherently militarised) coordination centres, from which almost all formal Ebola response operations were organised. Their contributions were therefore central to the outbreak response. However, the decision and process by which these actors first intervened is not well documented. Methods: In order to examine the historical origin of the militaries' intervention, 110 semistructured qualitative interviews with key stakeholders at the international, national and subnational level were conducted and analysed. Results: Military support to Sierra Leone's Ebola response was found to result from the advocacy and careful planning of a small number of individuals operating in Freetown, alongside closed-door negotiations occurring at the highest level of government in the UK. Conclusions: This has important implications for understanding elite decision-making related to the militarisation of aid and the wider securitisation agenda.

Indexed as

communicable disease controldisease outbreaksemergencieshistorypublic health

Identifiers

PMID40017855
PMCPMC11816942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.