ArticleBMJ public health2023
Using machine learning to identify COVID-19 vaccine-hesitancy predictors in the USA.
Article in BMJ public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI Meets Attitudes: Cross-Sectional Quantitative Study of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Alaska's Diverse Communities.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Beyond binary: a machine-learning classification of childhood COVID-19 vaccination intentions using behavioural data.Population health metrics · 2025Article
- Sociodemographic factors influencing childhood vaccination in Albania: a cross-sectional study.European journal of public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Vaccine hesitancy is complex, multicausative phenomenon that undermines public health efforts to contain the spread of infectious diseases. Improving our understanding of the drivers of vaccine hesitancy might improve our capacity to address it. Methods: We used the results of the May 2021 Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation's survey on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, which estimated the proportion of adults for every US county that felt either hesitant or unsure and strongly hesitant towards taking the COVID-19 vaccine when it becomes available. We developed a prediction model to identify the most important predictors of vaccine hesitancy. The potential predictors included demographic characteristics, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Social Vulnerability Index and the Republican Party's voting share in the 2020 presidential election as a proxy of political affiliation, all at the county level. Results: We found that the main drivers of vaccine hesitancy are income level, marital status, poverty, income, schooling, race/ethnicity, age, health insurance status and political affiliation. While the drivers are shared by both levels of hesitancy, the order changes. Particularly, political affiliation is a more important predictor for strong hesitancy than for hesitancy or unsure. Conclusions: These results deepen our understanding of the phenomenon and could help design more targeted interventions to reduce hesitancy in specific subgroups of the population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.