Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40017853›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2023

Using machine learning to identify COVID-19 vaccine-hesitancy predictors in the USA.

Enrique M Saldarriaga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Enrique M SaldarriagaUniversity of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8879-6354

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Vaccine hesitancy is complex, multicausative phenomenon that undermines public health efforts to contain the spread of infectious diseases. Improving our understanding of the drivers of vaccine hesitancy might improve our capacity to address it. Methods: We used the results of the May 2021 Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation's survey on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, which estimated the proportion of adults for every US county that felt either hesitant or unsure and strongly hesitant towards taking the COVID-19 vaccine when it becomes available. We developed a prediction model to identify the most important predictors of vaccine hesitancy. The potential predictors included demographic characteristics, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Social Vulnerability Index and the Republican Party's voting share in the 2020 presidential election as a proxy of political affiliation, all at the county level. Results: We found that the main drivers of vaccine hesitancy are income level, marital status, poverty, income, schooling, race/ethnicity, age, health insurance status and political affiliation. While the drivers are shared by both levels of hesitancy, the order changes. Particularly, political affiliation is a more important predictor for strong hesitancy than for hesitancy or unsure. Conclusions: These results deepen our understanding of the phenomenon and could help design more targeted interventions to reduce hesitancy in specific subgroups of the population.

Indexed as

COVID-19methodsPublic Healthstatistics and numerical data

Identifiers

PMID40017853
PMCPMC11812730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.