Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40017848›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2023

Infection with SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy and risk of stillbirth: a Scandinavian registry study.

Maria Christine Magnus, Anne Kristina Örtqvist, Stine Kjaer Urhoj, Anna Aabakke, Laust Hvas Mortensen, Håkon Gjessing, Anne-Marie Nybo Andersen, Olof Stephansson, Siri Eldevik Håberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Changes in Placentas of Pregnant Women Infected with COVID-19.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maria Christine MagnusCentre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-0568-3774
Anne Kristina ÖrtqvistDepartment of Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9019-9233
Stine Kjaer UrhojDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavn, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2069-9723
Anna AabakkeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Kobenhavn, Denmark.
Laust Hvas MortensenDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavn, Denmark.
Håkon GjessingCentre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Anne-Marie Nybo AndersenDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavn, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4296-8488
Olof StephanssonDepartment of Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1528-4563
Siri Eldevik HåbergCentre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A few studies indicate that women infected with SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy might have an increased risk of stillbirth. Our aim was to investigate the risk of stillbirth according to infection with SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy also taking the variant into account. Methods: We conducted a register-based study using the Swedish, Danish and Norwegian birth registries. A total of 389 949 births (1013 stillbirths) after 22 completed gestational weeks between 1 May 2020 and end of follow-up (27 January 2022 for Sweden and Norway; 31 December 2021 for Denmark). We estimated the risk of stillbirth following SARS-CoV-2 infection after 22 completed gestational weeks using Cox regression for each country, and combined the results using a random-effects meta-analysis. Results: SARS-CoV-2 infection after 22 completed gestational weeks was associated with an increased risk of stillbirth (adjusted HR 2.40; 95% CI 1.22 to 4.71). The risk was highest during the first weeks following infection, with an adjusted HR of 5.48 (95% CI 3.11 to 9.63) during the first 2 weeks, 4.38 (95% CI 2.41 to 7.98) during the first 4 weeks, and 3.71 (95% CI 1.81 to 7.59) during the first 6 weeks. Furthermore, the risk was greatest among women infected during the Delta-dominated period (adjusted HR 8.23; 95% CI 3.65 to 18.59), and more modest among women infected during the Index (adjusted HR 3.66; 95% CI 1.89 to 7.06) and Alpha (adjusted HR 2.73; 95% CI 1.13 to 6.59) dominated periods. Conclusions: We found an increased risk of stillbirth among women who were infected with SARS-CoV-2 after 22 gestational weeks, with the greatest risk during the Delta-dominated period.

Indexed as

COVID-19public healthrisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID40017848
PMCPMC11812723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.