Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40017845›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2023

Socioecological risk factors associated with Malaria in Pregnancy in an endemic state of India: a retrospective study.

Poonam Saroha, Sanjeev Kumar Gupta, Chander Prakash Yadav, Jasmita Gill, Prakash Sahoo, Himmat Singh, Vani H C, Sanghamitra Pati, Manju Rahi, Amit Sharma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Poonam SarohaAcademy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Council of Scientific & Industrial Research (CSIR), Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Sanjeev Kumar GuptaNational Institute of Malaria Research (NIMR), Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi, Delhi, India.
Chander Prakash YadavNational Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research, Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7531-6307
Jasmita GillNational Institute of Malaria Research (NIMR), Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi, Delhi, India.
Prakash SahooRegional Medical Research Centre (RMRC), Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Bhubneshwar, Odisha, India.
Himmat SinghAcademy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Council of Scientific & Industrial Research (CSIR), Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Vani H CBengaluru Field Unit, ICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
Sanghamitra PatiRegional Medical Research Centre (RMRC), Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Bhubneshwar, Odisha, India.
Manju RahiAcademy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Council of Scientific & Industrial Research (CSIR), Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Amit SharmaMolecular Medicine Group, International Centre For Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB) New Delhi, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3305-0034

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Malaria in Pregnancy (MiP) has significant adverse effects on both mother and fetus. Pregnant women in regions with unstable malaria transmission are three times more vulnerable to infection. This study analysed malaria prevalence among pregnant women in Odisha, India from 2016 to 2020 and compared it with overall malaria rates. Socioecological factors potentially influencing MiP prevalence were also examined. Methods: District-wise cases of malaria-positive pregnant women were analysed using a prevalence index named Malaria in Pregnancy rate (MiPr). The association of MiP with multidimensional poverty, forest cover and tribal population was studied. These three socioecological variables were compared with high and low MiPr (MiPr ≥1 or <1) respectively. Results: A strong positive association was observed between the Annual Parasite Index (API) and the MiPr in 2016 (0.95), 2017 (0.97), 2018 (0.88), 2019 (0.97) and 2020 (0.97). The districts comprising a multidimensionally poor population of 45% or more accounted for 67% of the MiP cases in 2020. The odds of getting MiP (MiPr ≥1) were 82.5 times higher in the districts where the tribal population was ≥50% and 3.39 times higher in the districts where the forest cover was ≥40%. In 2020, two districts with high MiPr, Malkangiri (MiPr=5.61) and Rayagada (MiPr=3.24), were above the threshold for all three variables. Conclusions: This work highlights an urgent need to increase awareness by the national control programme and the community in vulnerable regions through control and protection measures for pregnant women at higher risk of severe disease.

Indexed as

disease transmission, infectiousepidemiologypublic healthstatistics as topic

Identifiers

PMID40017845
PMCPMC11812682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.