Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40017788›Full record

ArticleJACS Au2025

Surface Modification of Polyesters Using Biosourced Soil-Release Polymers.

Matthieu Starck, Emanuella F Fiandra, Josephine Binks, Gang Si, Ruth Chilton, Mark Sivik, Richard L Thompson, Jing Li, Mark R Wilson, Clare S Mahon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACS Au, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Matthieu StarckDepartment of Chemistry, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LE, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8708-8145
Emanuella F FiandraDepartment of Chemistry, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LE, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5299-8728
Josephine BinksDepartment of Chemistry, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LE, United Kingdom.
Gang SiThe Procter & Gamble Newcastle Innovation Centre, Whitley Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE12 9BZ, United Kingdom.
Ruth ChiltonThe Procter & Gamble Newcastle Innovation Centre, Whitley Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE12 9BZ, United Kingdom.
Mark SivikProcter & Gamble Company, Fabric & Home Care Innovation Centre, Cincinnati, Ohio 45217, United States.
Richard L ThompsonDepartment of Chemistry, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LE, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3207-1036
Jing LiDepartment of Chemistry, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LE, United Kingdom.
Mark R WilsonDepartment of Chemistry, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LE, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6413-2780
Clare S MahonDepartment of Chemistry, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LE, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7358-1497

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil-release polymers (SRPs) are important components of fabric care formulations, performing important roles in the cleaning of synthetic fabrics. SRPs modify the surface of textiles and render materials resistant to staining, while offering environmental benefits by enabling effective cleaning using shorter, cooler wash cycles. Most SRPs used in formulations contain petroleum-sourced terephthalic acid, limiting the environmental benefits presented by the use of these key additives. Here, we have prepared SRPs using a selection of pyridine dicarboxylate monomers that can be accessed from biomass and assessed their ability to modify polyester surfaces. Interestingly, a wide range of surface deposition behavior was observed, with soil-release performance significantly impacted by the pyridine dicarboxylate component in use. The performance of polymers containing 2,5-pyridine dicarboxylate units exceeded or was comparable to that of current industry-standard SRPs, while polymers constructed using 2,4- or 2,6-pyridine dicarboxylate units displayed poor performance. Through a range of studies including dynamic light scattering, contact angle analysis, scanning electron microscopy, and molecular modeling we have explored the solution and interfacial behavior of SRPs and propose the observed changes in performance to arise from a combination of differences in solution self-assembly and variation in affinities for polyester surfaces. Our work highlights the potential of using biosourced starting materials in the replacement of petroleum-derived polymers within formulated consumer products and presents a rationale for the design of SRPs.

Identifiers

PMID40017788
PMCPMC11862958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.