Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40017743›Full record

ArticleJACS Au2025

Split Syntheses: Introducing Bottom-Up Control over Aluminum in SSZ-13 and ZSM-5 Zeolites.

Sven Robijns, Julien Devos, Beatrice Baeckelmans, Tom De Frene, Mostafa Torka Beydokhti, Rodrigo de Oliveira-Silva, Niels De Witte, Dimitrios Sakellariou, Tom R C Van Assche, Michiel Dusselier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACS Au, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sven RobijnsCenter for Sustainable Catalysis and Engineering (CSCE), KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200F, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9229-1578
Julien DevosCenter for Sustainable Catalysis and Engineering (CSCE), KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200F, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2254-9016
Beatrice BaeckelmansCenter for Sustainable Catalysis and Engineering (CSCE), KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200F, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium.
Tom De FreneCenter for Sustainable Catalysis and Engineering (CSCE), KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200F, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6768-4732
Mostafa Torka BeydokhtiCenter for Sustainable Catalysis and Engineering (CSCE), KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200F, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium.
Rodrigo de Oliveira-SilvaCentre for Membrane Separations, Adsorption, Catalysis and Spectroscopy for Sustainable Solutions (cMACS), KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200F, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3903-2678
Niels De WitteDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3541-1382
Dimitrios SakellariouCentre for Membrane Separations, Adsorption, Catalysis and Spectroscopy for Sustainable Solutions (cMACS), KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200F, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7424-5543
Tom R C Van AsscheDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0739-5688
Michiel DusselierCenter for Sustainable Catalysis and Engineering (CSCE), KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200F, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3074-2318

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zeolite synthesis is known as a difficult-to-control process, with many degrees of freedom that have a partially uncharted impact on the final product. Due to this, many zeolite scientists have regarded the initial mixing (aging) stage as the only time at which the chemical composition of a zeolite synthesis mixture can be impacted without heavily disrupting the delicate equilibria that are at play during crystallization. Recently, however, this view has started to change, with innovative techniques such as charge density mismatch or electro-assisted synthesis showing that the addition of new elements to the reactor midsynthesis might lead to new and surprising outcomes. In this manuscript, we show that by intermittent removal of certain fractions, notably Al-rich solids or Si-rich liquids, from the reaction medium during an interzeolite conversion from FAU-to-CHA (and FAU-to-MFI), one can control the Si/Al ratio of the final product, without heavily impacting the reaction time, particle size, or divalent cation capacity of the final product. This approach was named "split synthesis" and has led to several insights. By removing some Si-rich liquid phase after 40 min of synthesis, the Si/Al ratio of the daughter zeolite was lowered to a value of 20 (starting from 40), while the divalent cation capacity, a performance indicator for several acid and metal-catalyzed reactions, was kept maximized. On the other hand, when Al-rich solids were removed after 40 min (and in some cases colloidal silica was supplemented), we were able to rapidly synthesize small SSZ-13 zeolites with Si/Al ratios up to 180. These high-Si SSZ-13 zeolites had particle sizes in the range 100-150 nm and are traditionally difficult to crystallize in hydroxide medium. They showed a great olefin yield (6%) in the conversion of CO

Identifiers

PMID40017743
PMCPMC11862926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.