Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40017711›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025

Preterm-born children, screen time, and spectacle wear in the Longitudinal Preterm Outcome Project: a cohort study.

V Iyer, M L A de Kroon, C C W Klaver, S A Reijneveld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

V Iyer *Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
M L A de Kroon *Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
C C W KlaverDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
S A ReijneveldDepartment of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Preterm born children are at a higher risk for refractive errors. A long duration of screen time and activities with short working distance (≤30 cm) may further add to the increased risk. The aim of this study was to assess the separate and combined effects of preterm birth and screen time on spectacle wear among 5-year-olds and adolescents. Methods: We analyzed data from the community-based preterm cohort study, part of the Longitudinal Preterm Outcome Project (LOLLIPOP). Early preterm-born (EP < 32 weeks), moderately-late preterm-born (MLP 32-36 weeks) and full-term born (FT 38-42 weeks) children were followed. Spectacle wear and screen time were assessed by questionnaire at the age of 5 ( Results: At age 5, the prevalences of spectacle wear were 7.8%, 7.6% and 3.2%, for EP, MLP, and FT children, respectively ( Conclusions: EP and MLP children have a significantly increased risk of spectacle wear at age 5, but not significantly at adolescence. At that age, the prevalences of spectacle wear were generally higher. We found no evidence for an association of screen time preterm birth with spectacle wear, and neither an impact of screentime on such an association.

Indexed as

adolescentchildgestational agepreterm birthscreen timespectacles

Identifiers

PMID40017711
PMCPMC11865031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.