ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025
Reduced polyethylene wear in dual mobility versus single mobility hip implants: Results from quantitative and qualitative scanning electron microscopy analysis.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Reduced polyethylene wear in dual mobility versus single mobility hip implants: Results from quantitative and qualitative scanning electron microscopy analysis.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dual mobility cup in total hip arthroplasties has gained popularity worldwide as it reduces instability providing greater range of motion. However, increased polyethylene wear remains debated. This in vitro study aimed to measure and qualitatively analyse the wear of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene in contemporary dual mobility cup compared to conventional single mobility acetabular component. Methods: Hip simulator was used to compare ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear in dual mobility and single mobility acetabular component The specimens were tested at an in vitro angle of 30° relative to the ISO standard fixated position. Flexion/extension, abduction/adduction, and internal/external rotation were simulated. Testing was stopped every 0.5 million cycles until 5.0 million cycles were reached and the liners were disassembled and weighted to assess mass loss. The test fluid was sent for scanning electron microscopy analysis and wear particles were characterized for mean equivalent circle diameter, form factor, maximum Feret diameter, minimum Feret diameter, area, perimeter and aspect ratio. Results: Dual mobility hip reported a lower wear respect to single mobility (20.4 and 39.6 mg/Mcy, Conclusion: Dual mobility cup produces less wear than conventional single mobility acetabular component ensuring lower risk of instability and greater range of motion. Further studies are needed to definitively clarify the issue of wear in the dual mobility prosthesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.