ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025
Causal relationship between hormone levels and lung cancer: a Mendelian randomization study.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prolactin as a Candidate Biomarker in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Implications for Personalized Medicine and Post-Treatment Risk Stratification.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Causal association between inflammatory markers and malignant neoplasms of bone and articular cartilage using Mendelian randomization.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Testosterone and Androgen Receptor in Cancers with Significant Sex Dimorphism in Incidence Rates and Survival.Cancers · 2025Review
- Exploring the Causal Relationship Between Antidepressant Use and Lung Cancer Risk: A Mendelian Randomization Analysis.The clinical respiratory journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lung cancer is a highly prevalent neoplastic disease in various regions of the world, but the mechanism of its occurrence, development, and metastasis is not clear. Different hormone levels have different potential roles in the occurrence, development, and metastasis of lung cancer, but the association between hormone levels and lung cancer is not clear. Objective: This study aims to explore the causal relationship between hormone levels and lung cancer using Mendelian randomization. Sensitivity and heterogeneity tests were conducted to ensure the reliability of the results, offering insights into the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of lung cancer. Methods: We employed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis using large-scale publicly available genome-wide association studies (GWAS) data to assess the causal relationship between hormone levels and lung cancer. We explored the causal relationship between 15 hormones and three subtypes of lung cancer. The inverse variance weighted (IVW) method was used as the primary analysis, while MR-Egger, weighted median, weighted mode, and simple median were applied as supplementary methods. Sensitivity and heterogeneity tests were conducted to ensure the robustness of the findings. Results: We identified six hormone levels to be significantly associated with lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC): total testosterone, oestradiol, thyrotropin-releasing hormone, insulin, parathyroid hormone, and glucocorticoid. Among them, total testosterone, estradiol, and thyrotropin-releasing hormone were negatively correlated with morbidity. Insulin, prolactin levels, and parathyroid hormone were positively correlated with morbidity. Five hormone levels were significantly associated with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD): luteinizing hormone, thyroid hormones, insulin, prolactin levels, and parathyroid hormone. Luteinizing hormone and thyroid hormones were negatively correlated with morbidity, while insulin, prolactin levels, and parathyroid hormone were positively correlated with morbidity. Similarly, five hormone levels were linked to small cell lung cancer (SCLC): total testosterone, luteinizing hormone, estradiol, PTHrP, and insulin. Total testosterone and luteinizing hormone were negatively correlated with morbidity, while estradiol, Parathyroid Hormone-Related Peptide (PTHrP), and insulin were positively correlated with morbidity. Several hormones were associated with different subtypes of lung cancer. Insulin was significantly associated with all three types of lung cancer. Testosterone showed positive effects in LUSC and SCLC, and estradiol had varying effects, with a negative correlation in SCLC and a positive correlation in LUSC. Testosterone and estradiol were not significantly associated with LUAD. Luteinizing hormone showed positive effects in LUAD and SCLC, and parathyroid hormone showed negative effects in LUSC and LUAD. Conclusion: This study demonstrates significant causal relationships between specific hormone levels and various types of lung cancer, providing valuable insights for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment strategies of lung cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.