ReviewPeerJ2025
The large mammal fossil fauna of the Cradle of Humankind, South Africa: a review.
Review in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Features of Skin of Color.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
South Africa's Cradle of Humankind UNESCO World Heritage Site has remained the single richest source of hominin fossils for over ninety years. While its hominin specimens have been the subject of extensive research, the same is not true for its abundant faunal assemblages, despite their value in Plio-Pleistocene palaeoenvironmental reconstructions. Moreover, precise ages and depositional histories have been historically difficult to assess, though advancements in both relative and absolute dating techniques are changing this. This review explores the history of non-hominin large mammal faunal reporting, palaeoenvironmental reconstructions based on these fauna, and dating histories (with a focus on biochronology) at the following eight fossil-bearing sites of the Cradle that have been radiometrically dated with uranium-lead: Bolt's Farm, Cooper's Cave, Drimolen, Haasgat, Hoogland, Malapa, Sterkfontein and Swartkrans. Continued efforts to provide more precise and direct ages for sites using a variety of methods indicate that the bulk of Cradle deposits date to between 3 and 1.4 Ma. We find that, across almost all eight sites, there is little discussion or debate surrounding faunal reports, with some sites described by a single publication. Many of the reports are decades old with little review or reanalysis in the years following, emphasising the need for reviews such as this one. Our analysis of the data indicates that faunal-based paleoenvironmental reconstructions across sites commonly show a trend of wooded landscapes giving way to grasslands. We find that these reconstructions are primarily based on faunal abundance data, despite the availability of many other informative analytical techniques. The findings of this review highlight a need for more extensive and robust faunal reporting, as this will aid in understanding the context of these Cradle sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.