ReviewFrontiers in oncology2024
Research trends and hotspots evolution of artificial intelligence for cholangiocarcinoma over the past 10 years: a bibliometric analysis.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bibliometric analysis of research on artificial İntelligence applications in breast cancer diagnosis.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2026Article
- Understanding Liver and Digestive Diseases: A Paved Road to Improve Diagnosis, Management, and Treatment.Exploration of digestive diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the research hotspots and potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) through visualization. Methods: A comprehensive search of publications on the application of AI in CCA from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2023, within the Web of Science Core Collection, was conducted, and citation information was extracted. CiteSpace 6.2.R6 was used for the visualization analysis of citation information. Results: A total of 736 publications were included in this study. Early research primarily focused on traditional treatment methods and care strategies for CCA, but since 2019, there has been a significant shift towards the development and optimization of AI algorithms and their application in early cancer diagnosis and treatment decision-making. China emerged as the country with the highest volume of publications, while Khon Kaen University in Thailand was the academic institution with the highest number of publications. A core group of authors involved in a dense network of international collaboration was identified. Conclusion: The current research hotspots primarily revolve around three directions: AI in the diagnosis and classification of CCA, AI in the preoperative assessment of cancer metastasis risk in CCA, and AI in the prediction of postoperative recurrence in CCA. The complementarity and interdependence among different AI applications will facilitate future applications of AI in the CCA field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.