ArticleDigital health
Usability of a mobile app for suicide risk awareness in South Korea.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Suicide rates have significantly increased in South Korea, yet many individuals lack adequate support. Barriers such as reluctance to seek mental health help and fear of social stigma contribute to this gap. A mobile app focused on suicide risk awareness could provide accessible support, though none are currently available for public use in South Korea. This study conducted a usability test on a newly developed suicide risk awareness app using a mixed methods approach. Methods: Thirty-eight students from a large university in South Korea participated in the study, with 19 in a high-risk suicide group and 19 in a nonrisk suicide group. After using the app for 2 weeks, all participants completed an online usability survey, and 19 students took part in individual interviews. Results: Independent samples t-tests showed that participants, regardless of risk group, rated the app positively for ease of use, accessibility, design, perceived learning, and satisfaction. Regression analysis identified perceived learning as the strongest predictor of satisfaction, followed by ease of use. The qualitative analysis highlighted areas for improvement, including providing direct and guided feedback on suicide risk. Conclusion: The study demonstrated the potential of a mobile app to enhance suicide risk awareness among young adults in South Korea. Moreover, user engagement with the app can be improved by ensuring confidentiality and fostering perceived learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.