Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40017597›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025

Consumers' expected information search behavior for a pharmaceutical treatment.

Yifei Liu, Jack E Fincham, Morgan L Sperry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yifei LiuDivision of Pharmacy Practice and Administration, University of Missouri - Kansas City School of Pharmacy, Kansas City, MO, United States.
Jack E FinchamOsher Life Long Learning Institute, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Morgan L SperryDivision of Pharmacy Practice and Administration, University of Missouri - Kansas City School of Pharmacy, Kansas City, MO, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The Comprehensive Model of Information Seeking (CMIS) integrates multiple factors influencing information seeking. This study was to identify factors impacting consumers' expected information search behavior for a pharmaceutical treatment. By examining the predictive utility of these factors, the CMIS could be improved in the context of health information search. Methods: A telephone interview was administered to a random-digit-dialed sample of 2,186 adult residents in a southern U.S. state. Measurements included expected information search for a pharmaceutical treatment within the next 2 weeks, self-rated health (SRH), extraversion, and demographics. SRH was measured on a 4-point scale (Excellent-4, Poor-1), with higher scores indicating better subjective health. A logistic regression was conducted, in which the outcome variable was the expected information search for a pharmaceutical treatment, and covariates were SRH, extraversion, and demographics. Results: A total of 505 individuals participated. On average, they were 57 years old, and 61% of them were female. Fourteen percent of them expected to seek information for a pharmaceutical treatment. The logistic regression was significant (p < 0.01). SRH was a significant negative predictor (p < 0.05) and gender (female) was a significant positive predictor for the expected information-seeking behavior (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Consumers with lower SRH and women were more likely to perform expected information search for a pharmaceutical treatment. These findings have implications for both the modification of the CMIS and the provision of healthcare interventions.

Indexed as

consumer behaviorhealth informationinformation searchinformation seekingmedicationpharmaceutical treatment

Identifiers

PMID40017597
PMCPMC11864943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.