ArticleDEN open2025
Endoscopic features of gastric neuroendocrine tumors.
Article in DEN open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Breaking the Size Barrier: Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of a Massive Flat Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumor.ACG case reports journal · 2026Article
- Article
- Linked color imaging for detection and characterization of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Differences in Endoscopic Features of Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumor and Neuroendocrine Carcinoma From a Clinicopathological Perspective.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Review
- Step-by-Step Approach to the Incidental Diagnosis of Type I Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumors: Practical Insights.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The endoscopic features of gastric neuroendocrine tumors (G-NETs) remain unclarified. The present study investigated the endoscopic features of G-NETs in relation to the clinicopathological findings. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed consecutive patients with G-NETs who received endoscopic or surgical treatment between January 2005 and December 2023. The endoscopic and clinicopathological findings of the lesions were analyzed to provide diagnostic information. Results: Among 29 patients, the characteristic endoscopic findings of G-NETs on white-light images were reddish color (66%), dilated vessels (83%), submucosal tumor-like marginal elevation (59%), and central depression (48%). The gross appearance of G-NETs was classified into two macroscopic subtypes: reddish polypoid lesions ( Conclusions: These endoscopic features should increase the index of suspicion and help clinicians to correctly diagnose G-NETs through the pathological examination of biopsy specimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.