Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40017472›Full record

ArticleJournal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures)2025

Machine learning to predict extubation success using the spontaneous breathing trial, objective cough measurement, and diaphragmatic contraction velocity: Secondary analysis of the COBRE-US trial.

Fabio Varón-Vega, Eduardo Tuta-Quintero, Adriana Maldonado-Franco, Henry Robayo-Amórtegui, Luis F Giraldo-Cadavid, Daniel Botero-Rosas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fabio Varón-VegaFundación Neumológica Colombiana, Bogotá, Colombia.
Eduardo Tuta-QuinteroFundación Neumológica Colombiana, Bogotá, Colombia.
Adriana Maldonado-FrancoUniversidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia.
Henry Robayo-AmórteguiUniversidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia.
Luis F Giraldo-CadavidFundación Neumológica Colombiana, Bogotá, Colombia.
Daniel Botero-RosasUniversidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Determining the optimal timing for extubation in critically ill patients is essential to prevent complications. Predictive models based on Machine Learning (ML) have proven effective in anticipating weaning success, thereby improving clinical outcomes. Aim of the study: The study aimed to evaluate the predictive capacity of five ML techniques, both supervised and unsupervised, applied to the spontaneous breathing trial (SBT), objective cough measurement (OCM), and diaphragmatic contraction velocity (DCV) to estimate a favorable outcome of SBT and extubation in critically ill patients. Material and Methods: A post hoc analysis conducted on the COBRE-US study. The study included ICU patients who underwent evaluation of SBT, OCM, and DCV. Five ML techniques were applied: unsupervised and supervised to the data in both a training group and a test group. The diagnostic performance of each method was determined using accuracy. Results: In predicting SBT success, all supervised methods displayed the same accuracy in the training group (77.3%) and in the test group (69.6%). In predicting extubation success, decision trees demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy, 89.8% for the training group and 95.7% for the test group. The other supervised methods also showed a good diagnostic accuracy: 85.9% for the training group and 93.5% for the test group. Conclusions: In predictive models using OCM, DCV, and SBT as input variables through five ML techniques, decision trees and artificial neural networks demonstrated the best diagnostic performance. This suggests that these models can effectively classify patients who are likely to succeed in SBT and extubation during the weaning process from mechanical ventilation.

Indexed as

airway extubationcritical illnessmachine learningventilator weaning

Identifiers

PMID40017472
PMCPMC11864070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.