ArticleJournal of sleep research2025
Performance evaluation of an under-mattress sleep sensor versus polysomnography in > 400 nights with healthy and unhealthy sleep.
Article in Journal of sleep research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Barriers to the diagnosis and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in 15 francophone Sub-Saharan African countries: A multicountry survey.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2026Article
- Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Potential Sleeping Giant of Sport Performance and Health?Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Zero burden multi night monitoring with AI enabled technology reduces obstructive sleep apnea misdiagnosis.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- The All of Us Research Program's wearables dataset.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluation of a Contactless Sleep Monitoring Device for Sleep Stage Detection at Home in a Healthy Population: Prospective Study in Free-Living Conditions.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- The untapped potential of ballistographic technology in behavioural sleep medicine.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- The effect of standard time to daylight-saving clock transition on sleep and migraine headaches.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2026Observational
- Estimated sleep from an under-mattress device predicts next-day vigilance, working memory, and mental arithmetic performance.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2026Article
- ACCESS-OSA: a randomized controlled trial for accurate, accessible, and cost-effective screening solutions for obstructive sleep apnoea: study protocol.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2026Article
- Generation of a Free-Living Ground-Truth Validation Dataset for Wearable Measures of Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, Sleep, and Heart Rate in Adults (OxWEARS): Protocol for a Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Bidirectional associations between sleep and physical activity investigated using large-scale objective monitoring data.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Performance evaluation of an under-mattress sleep sensor versus polysomnography in > 400 nights with healthy and unhealthy sleep.Journal of sleep research · 2025Article
- "Social Apnea": Obstructive Sleep Apnea Is Exacerbated on Weekends.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Pilot study of dynamic lighting and sleep consolidation among older adults in a Jordanian senior care facility.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A mobile-based daily check-in approach to monitor patient reported outcomes in obstructive sleep apnea: results from a 6-month home-based observation study.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Consumer sleep trackers provide useful insight into sleep. However, large-scale performance evaluation studies are needed to properly understand sleep tracker accuracy. This study evaluated performance of an under-mattress sensor to estimate sleep and wake versus polysomnography in a large sample, including individuals with and without sleep disorders and during day versus night sleep opportunities, across multiple in-laboratory studies. One-hundred and eighty-three participants (51%/49% male/female, mean [SD] age = 45 [18] years) attended the sleep laboratory for a research study including simultaneous polysomnography and under-mattress sensor (Withings Sleep Analyser) recordings. Epoch-by-epoch analyses determined accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of the Withings Sleep Analyser versus polysomnography. Bland-Altman plots examined bias in sleep duration, efficiency, onset-latency, and wake after sleep onset. Overall Withings Sleep Analyser sleep-wake classification accuracy was 83%, sensitivity 95% and specificity 37%. The Withings Sleep Analyser significantly overestimated total sleep time (48 [81] min), sleep efficiency (9 [15]%) and sleep-onset latency (6 [26] min), and underestimated wake after sleep onset (54 [78] min). Accuracy and specificity were higher for night versus daytime sleep opportunities in healthy individuals (89% and 47% versus 82% and 26%, respectively, p < 0.05). Accuracy and sensitivity were also higher for healthy individuals (89% and 97%) versus those with sleep disorders (81% and 91%, p < 0.05). Withings Sleep Analyser performance is comparable to other consumer sleep trackers, with high sensitivity but poor specificity compared with polysomnography. Withings Sleep Analyser performance was reasonably stable, but more variable in daytime sleep opportunities and in people with a sleep disorder. Contactless, under-mattress sleep sensors show promise for accurate sleep monitoring, noting the tendency to over-estimate sleep particularly where wake time is high.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.