Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40017291›Full record

ArticleActa myologica : myopathies and cardiomyopathies : official journal of the Mediterranean Society of Myology2024

Impact of bariatric surgery on clinical outcome in LOPD.

Mattia Porcino, Fabio Guccione, Cristian Usbergo, Giuseppe Navarra, Antonio Toscano, Olimpia Musumeci

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Acta myologica : myopathies and cardiomyopathies : official journal of the Mediterranean Society of Myology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mattia PorcinoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Fabio GuccioneDepartment of Human Pathology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Cristian UsbergoAOU G. Martino di Messina, Italy.
Giuseppe NavarraDepartment of Human Pathology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Antonio ToscanoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Olimpia MusumeciDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This case study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of sleeve gastrectomy surgery in an obese patient with Late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD) and to explore the potential role of bariatric surgery in improving clinical outcomes and promoting a more physiological body composition when dietary and physical interventions fail. Methods: We describe a case of an obese LOPD patient who underwent sleeve gastrectomy, with clinical follow-up conducted to monitor motor and respiratory functions, as well as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), over time. Results: The surgery was well-tolerated without significant complications, and prolonged stability in motor and respiratory functions was observed. Furthermore, the patient reported improvements in quality of life and PROMs following weight loss. Conclusion: This case suggests that bariatric surgery, specifically sleeve gastrectomy, may be a safe and effective complementary strategy for weight loss in LOPD patients, offering benefits in functional stability, and quality of life.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryGastrectomyGlycogen Storage Disease Type IIObesityHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeWeight Lossbariatric surgeryBMIcomplementary treatmentERTLOPD

Identifiers

PMID40017291
PMCPMC11978425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.