ArticlePsychiatry investigation2025
Multidimensional Comparison of Methylphenidate and Atomoxetine in the Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Children, a 12-Week, Open-Label, Head-to-Head Clinical Trial.
Article in Psychiatry investigation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Eye-Tracking-Based Digital Therapeutic for ADHD in Children: Development and Preliminary Evaluation of an Adaptive Learning Guide.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Holistic Management of Adult ADHD with a History of Addiction: Emphasis on Low-Addiction-Risk Psychopharmacotherapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Selective Visual Attention in ADHD: A Narrative Review.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the treatment efficacy of methylphenidate and atomoxetine on core symptoms, behavioral and emotional problems, and executive function in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
methodsSixty children with ADHD diagnosed by the fifth edition Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders in Tangshan Maternal and Child Health Hospital from 2023 to 2024 were randomly divided into methylphenidate and atomoxetine groups. Core symptoms were assessed using the Parent Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham, Version IV Scale (SNAP-IV) and Integrated Visual and Auditory Continuous Performance Test (IVA-CPT). Behavioral and emotional problems were administered via the Conners Parent Symptom Questionnaire (PSQ) and executive function was evaluated utilizing the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) and Digit Span Test (DST). All data were analyzed using SPSS 26.00 to identify discrepancies.
resultsWhen contrasted with the methylphenidate and atomoxetine groups at 12 weeks, their mean efficiency was no significant disparity (p>0.05). Notable statistical differences were evident in IVA-CPT, the inattention, hyperactivity-impulsivity of SNAP-IV, and the psychosomatic disorder, anxiety, and hyperactivity-impulsivity of PSQ (p<0.05), yet in hyperactivity index, conduct, and learning difficulties of PSQ (p>0.05). No statistical significance was attributed to DST and the number of completed categories in WCST (p>0.05) but to response errors and perseverative errors (p<0.05).
conclusionAlthough both methylphenidate and atomoxetine are capable of effectively ameliorating ADHD, methylphenidate demonstrates a superior ability to improve core symptoms of ADHD, as well as address conduct problems, cognitive transfer abilities, and frontal lobe function in pediatric patients. Conversely, atomoxetine is the best choice for cases comorbid with anxiety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.