Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40017268›Full record

ReviewJournal of sleep research2025

Wearables as Translational Physiomarkers and Clinical Endpoints in Insomnia Research: Can Sleep Research Advance Psychiatry?

Victor I Spoormaker, Borbala Blaskovich

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of sleep research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Victor I SpoormakerMax Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4882-0572
Borbala BlaskovichMax Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1951-2420

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wearables that integrate actigraphy and pulse photoplethysmography (ACT + PPG) could represent a promising advancement in insomnia research and clinical practice. This especially applies to assessing objective sleep for a longer period in the home environment, which is impractical with ambulatory polysomnography (PSG) whereas actigraphy alone struggles with detecting wake-after-sleep-onset, as one of the most important variables for insomnia research (on which further variables, such as sleep efficiency, depend). The addition of heart rate and heart rate variability data to actigraphy strongly enhances WASO detection, offering hope for objective WASO detection for insomnia. For further physiomarker development, several challenges of ACT + PPG need to be tackled. Current commercial solutions often rely on "black-box" algorithms trained on small, healthy samples, leading to inaccuracies in sleep-disordered populations. Moreover, the lack of access to raw data hinders validation and cross-study comparability. These and other issues are addressed in detail in this opinion paper in order to raise awareness and start a discussion about more reliable, objective sleep markers that could be readily used as objective clinical endpoints in clinical trials on cognitive-behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) or stress-related mental disorders and novel pharmacological compounds. The sleep research community has the opportunity to establish ACT + PPG as a gold standard of home based, longitudinal sleep monitoring, which has the potential to bridge the gap between research and clinical practice, transforming clinical trials and improving psychiatric care.

Indexed as

ActigraphyPhotoplethysmographyPsychiatrySleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersTranslational Research, BiomedicalWearable Electronic DevicesHumansPolysomnographySleepactigraphyinsomniapulse photoplethysmography

Identifiers

PMID40017268
PMCPMC12426692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.