Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40017069›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons2025

Factors affecting anastomosis failure in microvascular fibula flap reconstruction of the maxillofacial region: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Elahe Tahmasebi, Samira Hajisadeghi, Shervin Shafiei, Hamidreza Moslemi, Reza Tabrizi, Mohammad Hosein Kalantar Motamedi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elahe TahmasebiResearch Center for Prevention of Oral and Dental Diseases, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1584-3735
Samira HajisadeghiResearch Center for Prevention of Oral and Dental Diseases, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8612- 1468
Shervin Shafieiepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0415-4678
Hamidreza Moslemiepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8568- 6571
Reza Tabriziepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2430-5502
Mohammad Hosein Kalantar MotamediResearch Center for Prevention of Oral and Dental Diseases, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7204-7746

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the contributory factors and failure rates in anastomosis during microvascular fibula flap reconstruction in maxillomandibular regions. A comprehensive search strategy was employed across databases including MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane's CENTRAL, as well as grey literature sources, and manual searches of noteworthy journals, covering studies from inception up to April 2023. The inclusion criteria targeted retrospective or prospective cohort and clinical studies that investigated functional and dental rehabilitation outcomes in human subjects undergoing maxillofacial reconstruction using microvascular fibula flaps. Exclusion criteria encompassed case-control studies, alternative reconstruction method research, and animal-based investigations. The study's findings revealed a cumulative vascular failure rate of 6%. Subsequent analysis delineated the primary causes of this failure, attributing 3% to venous thrombosis, 1% to arterial thrombosis, and less than 1% to blood vessel compression due to hematoma. However, notable heterogeneity across the studies indicates substantial variability in vascular failure rates reported. These results of our review and meta-analysis underscore the intricate factors impacting anastomosis success, such as anastomosis technique, recipient vessel quality, the choice between couplers.

Indexed as

FibulaSurgical anastomosisTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID40017069
PMCPMC11880671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.