Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40017004›Full record

ArticleFuture oncology (London, England)2025

CAMBRIA-1 & CAMBRIA-2 phase III trials: camizestrant versus standard endocrine therapy in ER+/HER2- early breast cancer.

Erika P Hamilton, Sibylle Loibl, Thomas Bachelot, Michael Gnant, Naoki Niikura, Yeon Hee Park, Sara M Tolaney, Barbara Pistilli, Priya Rastogi, Kamal S Saini and 9 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Future oncology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Erika P HamiltonMedical Oncology, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA.
Sibylle LoiblForschungs GmbH, German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany.
Thomas BachelotMedical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Michael GnantComprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Naoki NiikuraDepartment of Breast Surgery, Tokai University, Tokyo, Japan.
Yeon Hee ParkDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Sara M TolaneyMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Barbara PistilliDepartment of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, Villejuif, France.
Priya RastogiDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh and NSABP Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Kamal S SainiMedical Oncology, Fortrea, Inc, Durham, NC, USA.
Ioanna GioniLate Development Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Simon JohnstonLate Development Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Raquel NunesLate Development Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Angela QuintanaLate Development Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Mary StuartLate Development Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Emilia SytaLate Development Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Toronto, Canada.
Andrew WaldingLate Development Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Teresa KlinowskaLate Development Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Ingrid A MayerLate Development Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, NJ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Novel selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) are a promising therapeutic option under investigation for patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer. The efficacy of novel SERDs in the treatment of advanced disease has prompted investigation into their use in the early disease setting, to reduce breast cancer recurrence. Here, we describe the design and rationale of the phase III, randomized, open-label CAMBRIA-1 and CAMBRIA-2 studies. CAMBRIA-1 and CAMBRIA-2 are comparing the next-generation oral SERD camizestrant versus standard-of-care endocrine therapy (aromatase inhibitors or tamoxifen) in patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative early breast cancer, who are at intermediate or high risk of disease recurrence. CAMBRIA-1 is comparing 5 years of camizestrant versus endocrine therapy in patients who have already received 2-5 years of standard endocrine therapy, with or without cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors, and are without recurrence. CAMBRIA-2 is comparing 7 years of upfront adjuvant camizestrant versus endocrine therapy, with abemaciclib permitted in both treatment arms for the first 2 years. The primary endpoint for both studies is invasive breast cancer-free survival. Secondary endpoints include invasive disease-free survival, distant recurrence-free survival, overall survival, pharmacokinetics, patient-reported outcomes, safety and tolerability.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, HormonalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsAminopyridinesAromatase InhibitorsAzetidinesBenzimidazolesClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansIsoquinolinesMulticenter Studies as TopicNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReceptors, EstrogenabemaciclibAminopyridinesAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalAromatase InhibitorsAZD9833AzetidinesBenzimidazolesERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesIsoquinolinesReceptors, EstrogenTamoxifenBreastclinical trialsdrug developmenthormonal therapywomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID40017004
PMCPMC11916374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.