Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40016946›Full record

ArticleHIV medicine2025

Predicting PrEP acceptability and self-efficacy among men who have sex with men in the UK: The roles of identity resilience, science mistrust, and stigma.

Anthony J Gifford, Rusi Jaspal, Bethany A Jones, Daragh T McDermott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HIV medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anthony J GiffordNTU Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8337-9951
Rusi JaspalVice Chancellor's Office, University of Brighton, Brighton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8463-9519
Bethany A JonesNTU Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8872-5847
Daragh T McDermottNTU Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7005-6446

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is medication used to prevent the spread of HIV. Populations with increased need of HIV prevention (e.g., men who have sex with men [MSM]) are eligible for free PrEP in the UK. However, HIV surveillance reports indicate stagnated uptake of the drug, alongside increasing rates of HIV acquisition. As such, psychosocial research is needed to explore the social barriers to PrEP uptake. This study aimed to explore the role of identity resilience (i.e., ability to maintain a positive and stable sense of self) as a predictor for PrEP usage. We hypothesized that PrEP self-efficacy (i.e., belief in one's ability to take PrEP) would be positively predicted by PrEP acceptability. We also hypothesized that identity worth and identity continuity (components of identity resilience) would be associated with PrEP acceptability and PrEP self-efficacy. These would be mediated by mistrust in science, PrEP stigma, and perceived risk of HIV.

methodsIn total, 500 MSM who were assigned male at birth, were aged ≥18 years, and did not have HIV participated in an online cross-sectional, psychometric study between June and September 2023. Participants had to be based in the UK but could either be PrEP users or non-users. Structural equation modelling was used to explore a model of best fit to test the hypotheses.

resultsParticipants were aged 18-73 years (mean 35.61, standard deviation [SD] 9.95), mostly (91.2%) white, educated to an undergraduate level or above (70.9%), and non-users of PrEP (58.2%). Model fit was satisfactory: χ

conclusionsResults indicate that the decision to take PrEP is associated with the constructs of identity worth (i.e., self-esteem, self-efficacy, and distinctiveness) rather than risk-based appraisals alone. The reasons for accessing and using PrEP may no longer be motivated by an inherent perceived risk of HIV acquisition. When trying to increase PrEP uptake, addressing specific parts of identity resilience may be beneficial. For example, therapeutic interventions (e.g., counselling) could include interventions to improve positive sexual identities and self-esteem.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MalePatient Acceptance of Health CarePre-Exposure ProphylaxisResilience, PsychologicalSelf EfficacySocial StigmaTrustAdolescentAdultHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited KingdomYoung AdultHIVidentityMSMPrEPstigmaUK

Identifiers

PMID40016946
PMCPMC12045146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.